Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis *, Vasilis Barkoukis **, Cecile Thogersen-Ntoumani *, Nikos Ntoumanis *, Sarah Hardcastle *, Sheena Orbell *** and Martin S. Hagger *
(*) Department of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Australia
(**) Department of Psychology, University of Essex, United Kingdom
(***) Department of Physical Education and Sport, Aristotle University of Tessaloniki, Greece
Numerous studies conducted in real-life have examined effect of different prioritisation states on physical activity participation.However, the majority of these studies do not discuss effects associated with equal prioritasation- a state that combines a strong intention to engage in physical activities and an equally strong interaction to engage in an alternative behaviour. This article discusses sensitivity of a number of statiscal models in detecting effects associated with equal prioritisation in physical activity contexts. Advantages and disadvantages associated with using different statistical models are also highlighted.
Keywords: Alternative behaviours, Equal prioritisation, Model sensitivity, Physical activity intentions